SHARE THIS:

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini 4 Argon (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Haiku 5.5: 6 WinsvsGemini 4 Argon: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 4 Argon

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

View Claude Haiku 5.5 Full Specs →
Googleactive

Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon is Google's flagship reasoning model, built for complex software engineering, deep mathematical and scientific problem solving, and autonomous multi-step agents. Google trained it to keep context across...

View Gemini 4 Argon Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 Argon
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable releaseStable release
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-072026-10-13

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10

Gemini 4 Argon

$2.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.50

Gemini 4 Argon

$10.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 20.0x cheaper per input token than Gemini 4 Argon.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs72.8%+5.6% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini 4 Argon
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs69.0%+7.6% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini 4 Argon
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs42.2%+11.6% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini 4 Argon
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs29.6%+9.6% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini 4 Argon
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs76.8%+4.6% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini 4 Argon
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs7.9%+0.5% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini 4 Argon

Claude Haiku 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Gemini 4 Argon Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons