SHARE THIS:

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Haiku 5.5: 0 WinsvsGPT-6.1 Terra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

View Claude Haiku 5.5 Full Specs →
OpenAIactive

GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra is the mid-tier model in OpenAI's GPT-6.1 series, priced below GPT-6.1 Sol. It is suited for everyday agentic, coding, and writing work, is particularly strong at understanding screenshots...

View GPT-6.1 Terra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable releaseNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-072026-10-26

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10

GPT-6.1 Terra

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.50

GPT-6.1 Terra

$5.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 10.0x cheaper per input token than GPT-6.1 Terra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs79.8%+1.4% GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs78.0%+1.4% GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs55.2%+1.4% GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs40.6%+1.4% GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs82.8%+1.4% GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.5%+0.1% GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-6.1 Terra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Mercury 3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.