SHARE THIS:

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Haiku 5.5: 0 WinsvsKimi K3.1 Pro: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Kimi K3.1 Pro

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

View Claude Haiku 5.5 Full Specs →
Moonshot AIactive

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight multimodal reasoning model and a post-trained successor to Kimi K3, with a 1M-token context window. It is built for long-horizon coding, 3D...

View Kimi K3.1 Pro Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable releaseNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-072026-10-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10

Kimi K3.1 Pro

$2.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.50

Kimi K3.1 Pro

$10.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 20.0x cheaper per input token than Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs85.6%+7.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs84.8%+8.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs66.0%+12.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs47.4%+8.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs86.6%+5.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.9%+0.5% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Haiku 5.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆

Claude Haiku 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Kimi K3.1 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons