SHARE THIS:

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (DeepSeek). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Haiku 5.5: 6 WinsvsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 0 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

View Claude Haiku 5.5 Full Specs →
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the October 17, 2026 snapshot of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, served by DeepSeek under the `deepseek-flash` API model name. V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model...

View DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production StabilityStable releaseNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-072026-10-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.50

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.60

💡 Cost Ratio: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 1.5x cheaper per input token than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs74.4%+4.0% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs70.6%+6.0% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs43.8%+10.0% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs31.2%+8.0% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs78.4%+3.0% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.1%+0.3% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Claude Haiku 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons