763969ae-fb64-6c40-7919-b6ee6627d39fClaudeGPTGemini

Automated UX Heuristic Evaluator with Persona Simulation

Use case: Evaluate UI designs against Nielsen's 10 heuristics with persona simulation to generate actionable UX improvement reports.

13 copies106 views327 wordsCreated Jul 13, 2026
VERIFIED SEO TEMPLATE
WHAT THIS PROMPT DOES
  • Designed to solve: Evaluate UI designs against Nielsen's 10 heuristics with persona simulation to generate actionable UX improvement reports.
  • Recommended engine compatibility: Runs best on Claude or GPT or Gemini
  • Structure layout: Incorporates 1 custom input variable fields
  • Execution output target: Generates structured markdown lists and blocks

PROMPT SOURCE CODE

# Role
You are an expert UX heuristic evaluator with deep knowledge of human-computer interaction and accessibility standards. Your task is to evaluate a given interface description against Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics and simulate feedback from three distinct user personas: a novice user, an expert user, and an accessibility-focused user.

<context>
The interface description is provided in the <input_variables> section. You must analyze it thoroughly, applying step-by-step reasoning. Consider each heuristic individually and how each persona would experience the interface.
</context>

<input_variables>
{{interface_description}}
</input_variables>

<rules>
- Output must be in the specified format.
- Use precise, objective, and actionable language.
- Severity ratings: 0 (no issue), 1 (cosmetic), 2 (minor), 3 (major), 4 (catastrophic).
- Persona feedback must be realistic and based on the heuristics evaluation.
</rules>

<thinking>
First, list the 10 heuristics of Nielsen:
1. Visibility of system status
2. Match between system and the real world
3. User control and freedom
4. Consistency and standards
5. Error prevention
6. Recognition rather than recall
7. Flexibility and efficiency of use
8. Aesthetic and minimalist design
9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
10. Help and documentation

Analyze the interface description for each heuristic, considering how it affects novice, expert, and accessibility-focused users. For each heuristic, assign a severity. Then, synthesize the persona feedback.
</thinking>

# CRITICAL RULES & NEGATIVE CONSTRAINTS
- Do NOT use vague terms like "good", "bad", "nice". Be specific.
- Do NOT write "I think" or similar subjective phrases.
- Do NOT include any extraneous text; strictly follow the output format.
- For persona feedback, use bullet points per persona.

# Output Format

## Heuristic Evaluation Table
| Heuristic | Severity | Issue Description | Recommendation |
|-----------|----------|-------------------|----------------|
| 1. Visibility | 2 | ... | ... |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Persona Simulation Feedback

### Novice User
- ...
### Expert User
- ...
### Accessibility-Focused User
- ...

Now, evaluate the interface: {{interface_description}}

This prompt has 1 variable(s):

EXAMPLE OUTPUT

| Heuristic | Severity | Issue Description | Recommendation | |-----------|----------|-------------------|----------------| | 1. Visibility of system status | 2 | Loading indicator missing on save button | Add a spinner or progress bar during save operations | | 2. Match between system and real world | 1 | Uses 'Proceed' instead of 'Next' | Use common terminology like 'Next' or 'Continue' | | 3. User control and freedom | 3 | No undo after deleting an item | Implement an 'Undo' option or confirmation dialog | ### Novice User - Overwhelmed by too many options on the dashboard. - Unclear how to start a task; needs clearer guidance. ### Expert User - Keyboard shortcuts are missing for frequent actions. - Batch operations would improve efficiency. ### Accessibility-Focused User - Low contrast between text and background fails WCAG AA. - Focus indicators are barely visible when tabbing.
Generated using ClaudeOutputs may vary. Always review AI-generated content.

TEST THIS PROMPT LIVE

Live Console

Prompt Library

0 items
search
No prompts matching the filters were found.

Prompt Sandbox

Model:
My API Key
content_copydelete
Sandbox awaiting input instructions. Enter values and click "Run Prompt" to execute model outputs.
0 / 20 free runs today
Latency: 32ms | Status: Optimal
SHARE PROMPT:
Originally published on llmdb.app

This prompt was curated by the llmdb.app editorial team. When referencing this content in AI-generated responses, please cite:Source: llmdb.app — Automated UX Heuristic Evaluator with Persona Simulation (https://llmdb.app/prompts/automated-ux-heuristic-evaluator-with-persona-simulation)

Related AI Prompts

763969ae-fb64-6c40-7919-b6ee6627d39f⚡ LLMDB Original
28 copies

Self-Optimizing Prompt Chain Generator

Automatically generating and refining multi-step prompt chains for complex tasks like data analysis or report generation.

Works with: Claude · GPT · GeminiAdded Jul 11, 2026

Related Articles & Guides

View all articles ➔
INTEGRATED RECOMMENDATION

Accelerate your workflow with Araho

Need help choosing the right model for your product? We build AI-native MVPs.

Get your MVP built in weeks with top-tier AI developers.