SHARE THIS:

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Haiku 5.5: 6 WinsvsGemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Claude Haiku 5.5

1,000,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Haiku 5.5

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

View Claude Haiku 5.5 Full Specs →
Googleactive

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the successor to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. It generates clips up to 15 seconds long with native...

View Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window1,000,000 tokens🏆131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable releaseNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-072026-11-05

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.10

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$1.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Haiku 5.5

$0.50

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$9.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 15.0x cheaper per input token than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs73.2%+5.2% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs69.4%+7.2% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs42.6%+11.2% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs30.0%+9.2% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs77.2%+4.2% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.0%+0.4% Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons