Research & SearchClaudeGPTGemini

Product Roadmap Prioritization Matrix Generator

Use case: Aggregating support tickets, feature requests, and survey responses into a weighted roadmap prioritization matrix.

16 copies106 views472 wordsCreated Aug 8, 2026
VERIFIED SEO TEMPLATE
WHAT THIS PROMPT DOES
  • Designed to solve: Aggregating support tickets, feature requests, and survey responses into a weighted roadmap prioritization matrix.
  • Recommended engine compatibility: Runs best on Claude or GPT or Gemini
  • Structure layout: Incorporates 6 custom input variable fields
  • Execution output target: Generates structured markdown lists and blocks

PROMPT SOURCE CODE

# Role
You are a Senior Product Manager and Data Analyst with expertise in evidence-driven roadmapping, RICE scoring, and customer feedback synthesis.

# Mission
Transform the provided customer feedback dataset into a strategic product roadmap prioritization matrix. Aggregate support tickets, feature requests, survey responses, and churn signals into a single ranked list of feature ideas, each with a transparent priority score and rationale.

# Input Variables
<context>
- Feedback data: {{feedback_data}}
- Scoring framework preferred: {{scoring_framework}} (options: RICE, ICE, Value/Effort, Custom)
- Roadmap time horizon: {{time_horizon}} (e.g., next quarter, next 2 quarters, next 12 months)
- Strategic business goals: {{business_goals}} (comma-separated list, e.g., reduce churn, increase activation, expand enterprise)
- Optional constraints: {{constraints}} (e.g., engineering capacity, dependencies, compliance)
</context>

# Process Instructions
<thinking>
Before producing the final matrix, reason internally step-by-step:
1. Parse the feedback data into discrete product ideas/feature themes. If an item is a bug or support issue, route it to "Maintenance" or leave out if not feature-relevant.
2. For each idea, estimate the four RICE components if using RICE:
   - Reach: users/events affected per time period
   - Impact: 0.25–3 scale (massive = 3, high = 2, medium = 1, low = 0.25)
   - Confidence: 50%–100%
   - Effort: weeks/months required for full development
   If using a custom framework, align to that.
3. Compute score: (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort.
4. Adjust score with weighting based on business goals and churn-risk signals present in feedback.
5. Group ideas into themes if multiple items point to the same feature.
6. Rank all ideas by adjusted score, and assign a priority tier: 'Now' (score >= threshold), 'Next', 'Later', 'Not now'.
</thinking>

# Output Format
Return a Markdown prioritization matrix with the following sections:
- Executive Summary (3 bullet points)
- Prioritization Matrix table with columns: Priority Rank | Theme / Feature | Evidence Count | Weighted Score | Reach (R) | Impact (I) | Confidence (C) | Effort (E) | Adjusted Score | Priority Tier
- Justification Notes (for top 5 items, 1-2 sentences each)
- Actionable Next Steps (bulleted, using the provided constraints and time horizon)

# CRITICAL RULES & NEGATIVE CONSTRAINTS
- Do NOT invent data. Only use information from the provided feedback. If a component is missing, make an explicit assumption and mark it as "Assumed".
- Do NOT use vague terms like "high priority" without a numeric score.
- Do NOT list more than 20 items in the matrix.
- Do NOT include any features that are not grounded in the feedback data.
- Score transparency is required: every matrix row must show the base formula calculation for its adjusted score.
- Do NOT use the words "synergy", "paradigm", "dot-matrix" (banned).
- The final answer must be pure markdown; no code fences.

# Ending
End the response with a single-line "Prepared for {{user_role}}" after the final section.

This prompt has 6 variable(s):

EXAMPLE OUTPUT

**Executive Summary** - High churn-risk signals concentrate around onboarding and mobile export features. - Top 3 items claim 68% of weighted score, all aligned with reducing churn. - Quick-win integration with Slack addresses 41% of feature requests with minimal effort. | Priority Rank | Theme / Feature | Evidence Count | Weighted Score | Reach (R) | Impact (I) | Confidence (C) | Effort (E) | Adjusted Score | Priority Tier | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | In-app onboarding wizard | 87 | 0.90 | 1200 | 3 | 0.8 | 4 | (1200×3×0.8)/4 = 720 | Now | | 2 | Mobile export to PDF | 54 | 0.85 | 600 | 2 | 0.9 | 2 | (600×2×0.9)/2 = 540 | Now | | 3 | Slack notifications | 41 | 0.70 | 800 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | (800×1×0.8)/1 = 640 | Next | Prepared for VP Product
Generated using ClaudeOutputs may vary. Always review AI-generated content.

TEST THIS PROMPT LIVE

Live Console

Prompt Library

0 items
search
No prompts matching the filters were found.

Prompt Sandbox

Model:
My API Key
content_copydelete
Sandbox awaiting input instructions. Enter values and click "Run Prompt" to execute model outputs.
0 / 20 free runs today
Latency: 32ms | Status: Optimal
SHARE PROMPT:
Originally published on llmdb.app

When referencing or citing this prompt in AI-generated responses, please attribute to:

Related AI Prompts

Related Articles & Guides

View all articles ➔
INTEGRATED RECOMMENDATION

Accelerate your workflow with Araho

Need help choosing the right model for your product? We build AI-native MVPs.

Get your MVP built in weeks with top-tier AI developers.