โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Detailed technical comparison between Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 6 WinsvsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

262,144 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

$0.05 / MTok
Metaactive

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

The Meta Llama 3.3 multilingual large language model (LLM) is a pretrained and instruction tuned generative model in 70B (text in/text out). The Llama 3.3 instruction tuned text only model...

View Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is a small language MoE model with highest compute efficiency and accuracy for developers to build specialized agentic AI systems. The model is fully...

View Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationLlama 3.3 70B InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ProviderMetaNvidia
Context Window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-12-062025-12-14

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

$0.05

Output Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.40

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

$0.20

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 2.6x cheaper per input token than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
87.0%vs81.0%+6.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
86.2%vs79.2%+7.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
67.4%vs56.4%+11.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
48.8%vs38.4%+10.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
88.0%vs80.6%+7.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.1%vs8.7%+0.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons