โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs DeepSeek V3.1

Detailed technical comparison between Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) and DeepSeek V3.1 (DeepSeek). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 6 WinsvsDeepSeek V3.1: 0 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek V3.1

163,840 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13 / MTok
Metaactive

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

The Meta Llama 3.3 multilingual large language model (LLM) is a pretrained and instruction tuned generative model in 70B (text in/text out). The Llama 3.3 instruction tuned text only model...

View Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1 is a large hybrid reasoning model (671B parameters, 37B active) that supports both thinking and non-thinking modes via prompt templates. It extends the DeepSeek-V3 base with a two-phase long-context...

View DeepSeek V3.1 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationLlama 3.3 70B InstructDeepSeek V3.1
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Context Window131,072 tokens163,840 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostableself hostable
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-12-062025-08-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.40

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.95

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper per input token than DeepSeek V3.1.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
87.0%vs80.0%+7.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
86.2%vs78.2%+8.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
67.4%vs55.4%+12.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
48.8%vs40.8%+8.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
88.0%vs83.0%+5.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.1%vs8.6%+0.5% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

DeepSeek V3.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons