SHARE THIS:

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Muse Spark Open

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash (Google) and Muse Spark Open (Meta). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 0 WinsvsMuse Spark Open: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Muse Spark Open

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Muse Spark Open

$1.25 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the successor to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. It generates clips up to 15 seconds long with native...

View Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Full Specs →
Metaactive

Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open is a coding-optimized open-weight model. Trained specifically for agentic coding workflows, it delivers higher first-attempt accuracy, reliable tool calling, and deep codebase understanding across the repos developers...

View Muse Spark Open Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Spark Open
ProviderGoogleMeta
Context Window131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-11-052026-10-15

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$1.50

Muse Spark Open

$1.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$9.00

Muse Spark Open

$4.25

💡 Cost Ratio: Muse Spark Open is 1.2x cheaper per input token than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.2%vs81.6%+8.4% Muse Spark Open
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Muse Spark Open 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.4%vs76.4%+7.0% Muse Spark Open
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Muse Spark Open 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.6%vs53.6%+11.0% Muse Spark Open
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Muse Spark Open 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
30.0%vs39.0%+9.0% Muse Spark Open
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Muse Spark Open 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.2%vs81.2%+4.0% Muse Spark Open
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Muse Spark Open 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.4%+0.4% Muse Spark Open
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Muse Spark Open 🏆

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Muse Spark Open Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Auto Code

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Hy4

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.