SHARE THIS:

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash (Google) and GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 0 WinsvsGPT-6.1 Terra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra

$1.00 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the successor to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. It generates clips up to 15 seconds long with native...

View Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Full Specs →
OpenAIactive

GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra is the mid-tier model in OpenAI's GPT-6.1 series, priced below GPT-6.1 Sol. It is suited for everyday agentic, coding, and writing work, is particularly strong at understanding screenshots...

View GPT-6.1 Terra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Context Window131,072 tokens1,050,000 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-11-052026-10-26

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$1.50

GPT-6.1 Terra

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$9.00

GPT-6.1 Terra

$5.00

💡 Cost Ratio: GPT-6.1 Terra is 1.5x cheaper per input token than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.2%vs79.8%+6.6% GPT-6.1 Terra
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.4%vs78.0%+8.6% GPT-6.1 Terra
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.6%vs55.2%+12.6% GPT-6.1 Terra
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
30.0%vs40.6%+10.6% GPT-6.1 Terra
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.2%vs82.8%+5.6% GPT-6.1 Terra
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.5%+0.6% GPT-6.1 Terra
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-6.1 Terra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Auto Code

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Hy4

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.