SHARE THIS:

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash (Google) and Grok 4.7 (xAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 0 WinsvsGrok 4.7: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Grok 4.7

500,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$1.50 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the successor to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. It generates clips up to 15 seconds long with native...

View Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Full Specs →
xAIactive

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering tasks, verifying its own work, and...

View Grok 4.7 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini Omni 1.2 FlashGrok 4.7
ProviderGooglexAI
Context Window131,072 tokens500,000 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-11-052026-09-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$1.50

Grok 4.7

$2.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$9.00

Grok 4.7

$6.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is 1.3x cheaper per input token than Grok 4.7.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.2%vs79.2%+6.0% Grok 4.7
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Grok 4.7 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.4%vs77.4%+8.0% Grok 4.7
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Grok 4.7 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.6%vs54.6%+12.0% Grok 4.7
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Grok 4.7 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
30.0%vs40.0%+10.0% Grok 4.7
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Grok 4.7 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.2%vs82.2%+5.0% Grok 4.7
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Grok 4.7 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.5%+0.5% Grok 4.7
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
Grok 4.7 🏆

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Grok 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Auto Code

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Hy4

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.