← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Small 3

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and Mistral Small 3 (Mistral). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Opus 5: 1 WinvsMistral Small 3: 4 Wins
Context Leader

Claude Opus 5

1,000,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Mistral Small 3

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual analysis...

View Claude Opus 5 Full Specs β†’
Mistralactive

Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is a 24B-parameter language model optimized for low-latency performance across common AI tasks. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, it features both pre-trained and instruction-tuned versions designed...

View Mistral Small 3 Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Opus 5Mistral Small 3
ProviderAnthropicMistral
Context Window1,000,000 tokensπŸ†32,768 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarked84/100 (est.)
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT data120 ms (est.)
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-07-242025-01-30

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 5

$5.00

Mistral Small 3

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 5

$25.00

Mistral Small 3

$0.30

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Mistral Small 3 is 50.0x cheaper per input token than Claude Opus 5.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
81.2%vs81.2%+0.0% Mistral Small 3
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Small 3
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
79.4%vs83.0%+3.6% Mistral Small 3
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Small 3 πŸ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
56.6%vs68.0%+11.4% Mistral Small 3
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Small 3 πŸ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
38.6%vs45.0%+6.4% Mistral Small 3
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Small 3 πŸ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
80.8%vs85.0%+4.2% Mistral Small 3
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Small 3 πŸ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.3%vs8.3%+0.0% Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 πŸ†
Mistral Small 3

Claude Opus 5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Mistral Small 3 Quirks & Gotchas

  • β–ΈFastest TTFT at lowest cost β€” ideal for high-volume classification
  • β–ΈNot designed for complex reasoning β€” route multi-step tasks to Mistral Large 3

Explore Other Popular Comparisons