← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and Mistral Medium 3.1 (Mistral). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Opus 5: 3 WinsvsMistral Medium 3.1: 3 Wins
Context Leader

Claude Opus 5

1,000,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Mistral Medium 3.1

$0.40 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual analysis...

View Claude Opus 5 Full Specs β†’
Mistralactive

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 is an updated version of Mistral Medium 3, which is a high-performance enterprise-grade language model designed to deliver frontier-level capabilities at significantly reduced operational cost. It balances...

View Mistral Medium 3.1 Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Opus 5Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral
Context Window1,000,000 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-07-242025-08-13

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 5

$5.00

Mistral Medium 3.1

$0.40

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 5

$25.00

Mistral Medium 3.1

$2.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Mistral Medium 3.1 is 12.5x cheaper per input token than Claude Opus 5.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
81.2%vs80.2%+1.0% Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 πŸ†
Mistral Medium 3.1
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
79.4%vs78.4%+1.0% Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 πŸ†
Mistral Medium 3.1
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
56.6%vs55.6%+1.0% Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5 πŸ†
Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
38.6%vs41.0%+2.4% Mistral Medium 3.1
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Medium 3.1 πŸ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
80.8%vs83.2%+2.4% Mistral Medium 3.1
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Medium 3.1 πŸ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.3%vs8.6%+0.2% Mistral Medium 3.1
Claude Opus 5
Mistral Medium 3.1 πŸ†

Claude Opus 5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons