โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

MiMo-V2.5 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) and GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

MiMo-V2.5: 6 WinsvsGLM 4.7 Flash: 0 Wins
Context Leader

MiMo-V2.5

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
Xiaomiactive

MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi. It delivers Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the inference cost, while surpassing MiMo-V2-Omni in multimodal perception across image and video understanding...

View MiMo-V2.5 Full Specs โ†’
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationMiMo-V2.5GLM 4.7 Flash
ProviderXiaomiZhipu AI
Context Window1,050,000 tokens๐Ÿ†202,752 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-222026-01-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

MiMo-V2.5

$0.14

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

MiMo-V2.5

$0.28

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 2.3x cheaper per input token than MiMo-V2.5.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
81.4%vs77.2%+4.2% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
79.6%vs78.5%+1.1% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.4%vs40.0%+13.4% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
38.8%vs31.0%+7.8% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.0%vs80.0%+1.0% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.1%+0.3% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
GLM 4.7 Flash

MiMo-V2.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons