โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

MiMo-V2.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1

Detailed technical comparison between MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) and DeepSeek V3.1 (DeepSeek). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

MiMo-V2.5: 2 WinsvsDeepSeek V3.1: 4 Wins
Context Leader

MiMo-V2.5

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

MiMo-V2.5

$0.14 / MTok
Xiaomiactive

MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi. It delivers Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the inference cost, while surpassing MiMo-V2-Omni in multimodal perception across image and video understanding...

View MiMo-V2.5 Full Specs โ†’
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1 is a large hybrid reasoning model (671B parameters, 37B active) that supports both thinking and non-thinking modes via prompt templates. It extends the DeepSeek-V3 base with a two-phase long-context...

View DeepSeek V3.1 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationMiMo-V2.5DeepSeek V3.1
ProviderXiaomiDeepSeek
Context Window1,050,000 tokens๐Ÿ†163,840 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-222025-08-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

MiMo-V2.5

$0.14

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.25

Output Price per Million Tokens

MiMo-V2.5

$0.28

DeepSeek V3.1

$0.95

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: MiMo-V2.5 is 1.8x cheaper per input token than DeepSeek V3.1.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
81.4%vs80.0%+1.4% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
79.6%vs78.2%+1.4% MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 ๐Ÿ†
DeepSeek V3.1
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.4%vs55.4%+2.0% DeepSeek V3.1
MiMo-V2.5
DeepSeek V3.1 ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
38.8%vs40.8%+2.0% DeepSeek V3.1
MiMo-V2.5
DeepSeek V3.1 ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.0%vs83.0%+2.0% DeepSeek V3.1
MiMo-V2.5
DeepSeek V3.1 ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.6%+0.2% DeepSeek V3.1
MiMo-V2.5
DeepSeek V3.1 ๐Ÿ†

MiMo-V2.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

DeepSeek V3.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons