← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 0 WinsvsLlama 3.3 70B Instruct: 6 Wins
Context Leader

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13 / MTok
Xiaomiactive

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Xiaomi’s flagship model, delivering strong performance in general agentic capabilities, complex software engineering, and long-horizon tasks, with top rankings on benchmarks such as ClawEval, GDPVal, and SWE-bench Pro....

View MiMo-V2.5-Pro Full Specs β†’
Metaactive

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

The Meta Llama 3.3 multilingual large language model (LLM) is a pretrained and instruction tuned generative model in 70B (text in/text out). The Llama 3.3 instruction tuned text only model...

View Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationMiMo-V2.5-ProLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMeta
Context Window1,050,000 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-222024-12-06

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

$0.43

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13

Output Price per Million Tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

$0.87

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.40

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 3.3x cheaper per input token than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
86.6%vs87.0%+0.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct πŸ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
85.8%vs86.2%+0.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct πŸ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
67.0%vs67.4%+0.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct πŸ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
48.4%vs48.8%+0.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct πŸ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
87.6%vs88.0%+0.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct πŸ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.0%vs9.1%+0.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct πŸ†

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons