โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Solar Pro 3

Detailed technical comparison between Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) and Solar Pro 3 (Upstage). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 4 WinsvsSolar Pro 3: 1 Win
Context Leader

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

131,072 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13 / MTok
Metaactive

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta's state-of-the-art open weights model, providing enterprise-grade reasoning and logic. Exceptionally powerful for self-hosted customer support, text generation, and tooling workflows.

View Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Full Specs โ†’
Upstageactive

Solar Pro 3

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...

View Solar Pro 3 Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationLlama 3.3 70B InstructSolar Pro 3
ProviderMetaUpstage
Context Window131,072 tokens๐Ÿ†128,000 tokens
Agent Suitability83/100 (est.)Not yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)280 ms (est.)No public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-12-062026-01-27

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.13

Solar Pro 3

$0.15

Output Price per Million Tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$0.40

Solar Pro 3

$0.60

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 1.2x cheaper per input token than Solar Pro 3.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
86.2%vs86.2%+0.0% Solar Pro 3
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Solar Pro 3
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
88.0%vs85.4%+2.6% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Solar Pro 3
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
75.0%vs66.6%+8.4% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Solar Pro 3
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
52.0%vs48.0%+4.0% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Solar Pro 3
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
88.5%vs87.2%+1.3% Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
Solar Pro 3
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.8%vs9.0%+0.2% Solar Pro 3
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Solar Pro 3 ๐Ÿ†

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธStable, well-documented self-hosted option with strong community support
  • โ–ธOutperformed by Llama 4 Maverick for agentic tool-calling workflows

Solar Pro 3 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons