Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GPT-5.2-Codex
Detailed technical comparison between Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) and GPT-5.2-Codex (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.
Comparison Snapshot
GPT-5.2-Codex
400,000 tokensTie
Equal CapabilityTie
Equal SpeedLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
$0.13 / MTokLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta's state-of-the-art open weights model, providing enterprise-grade reasoning and logic. Exceptionally powerful for self-hosted customer support, text generation, and tooling workflows.
GPT-5.2-Codex
GPT-5.2-Codex is an upgraded version of GPT-5.1-Codex optimized for software engineering and coding workflows. It is designed for both interactive development sessions and long, independent execution of complex engineering tasks....
Technical Specifications
🏆 = Superior Spec| Specification | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | GPT-5.2-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Context Window | 131,072 tokens | 400,000 tokens🏆 |
| Agent Suitability | 83/100 (est.) | Not yet benchmarked |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 280 ms (est.) | No public TTFT data |
| Deployment Model | self hostable | managed api |
| Production Stability | Stable GA (est.) | Stable GA (est.) |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2024-12-06 | 2026-01-14 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
$0.13
GPT-5.2-Codex
$1.75
Output Price per Million Tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
$0.40
GPT-5.2-Codex
$14.00
💡 Cost Ratio: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 13.5x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.2-Codex.
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Standardized Scores (0–100%)Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Stable, well-documented self-hosted option with strong community support
- ▸Outperformed by Llama 4 Maverick for agentic tool-calling workflows
GPT-5.2-Codex Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Explore Other Popular Comparisons
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWLlama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWLlama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GLM 5.2
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWLlama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWLlama 3.3 70B Instruct vs DeepSeek V3.1
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWLlama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.