SHARE THIS:

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mercury 3

Detailed technical comparison between Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI) and Mercury 3 (Inception AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Kimi K3.1 Pro: 6 WinsvsMercury 3: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Kimi K3.1 Pro

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Mercury 3

$0.10 / MTok
Moonshot AIactive

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight multimodal reasoning model and a post-trained successor to Kimi K3, with a 1M-token context window. It is built for long-horizon coding, 3D...

View Kimi K3.1 Pro Full Specs →
Inception AIactive

Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is a diffusion-based language model from Inception, and the lab's most capable model to date. It is suited for agentic workflows and real-time applications where latency compounds, such...

View Mercury 3 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationKimi K3.1 ProMercury 3
ProviderMoonshot AIInception AI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆1,000,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-232026-10-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

$2.00

Mercury 3

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

$10.00

Mercury 3

$0.35

💡 Cost Ratio: Mercury 3 is 20.0x cheaper per input token than Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
85.6%vs79.4%+6.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
Mercury 3
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
84.8%vs77.6%+7.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
Mercury 3
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
66.0%vs54.8%+11.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
Mercury 3
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
47.4%vs40.2%+7.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
Mercury 3
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
86.6%vs82.4%+4.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
Mercury 3
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.9%vs8.5%+0.4% Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
Mercury 3

Kimi K3.1 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Mercury 3 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons