โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Hermes 4 405B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Hermes 4 405B (Nous Research) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (Alibaba). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Hermes 4 405B: 0 WinsvsQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Hermes 4 405B

131,072 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

$0.66 / MTok
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 4 405B

Hermes 4 is a large-scale reasoning model built on Meta-Llama-3.1-405B and released by Nous Research. It introduces a hybrid reasoning mode, where the model can choose to deliberate internally with...

View Hermes 4 405B Full Specs โ†’
Alibabaactive

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5-Coder is the latest series of Code-Specific Qwen large language models (formerly known as CodeQwen). Qwen2.5-Coder brings the following improvements upon CodeQwen1.5: - Significantly improvements in **code generation**, **code reasoning**...

View Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationHermes 4 405BQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
ProviderNous ResearchAlibaba
Context Window131,072 tokens๐Ÿ†32,768 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-262024-11-11

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 4 405B

$1.00

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

$0.66

Output Price per Million Tokens

Hermes 4 405B

$3.00

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

$1.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper per input token than Hermes 4 405B.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.6%vs81.2%+2.6% Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Hermes 4 405B
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.8%vs91.5%+14.7% Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Hermes 4 405B
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.0%vs68.0%+14.0% Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Hermes 4 405B
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.4%vs40.5%+1.1% Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Hermes 4 405B
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.6%vs84.0%+2.4% Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Hermes 4 405B
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.8%+0.4% Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Hermes 4 405B
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct ๐Ÿ†

Hermes 4 405B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons