SHARE THIS:

Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between Grok 4.7 (xAI) and MiniMax M3.1 Flash (MiniMax). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Grok 4.7: 0 WinsvsMiniMax M3.1 Flash: 6 Wins
Context Leader

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

$0.07 / MTok
xAIactive

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering tasks, verifying its own work, and...

View Grok 4.7 Full Specs →
MiniMaxactive

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is a multimodal model from MiniMax. Compared with M3, it delivers significant improvements across multiple benchmarks, particularly in complex agentic tasks, coding, and cybersecurity. It is built for complex,...

View MiniMax M3.1 Flash Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGrok 4.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
ProviderxAIMiniMax
Context Window500,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-09-212026-10-19

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Grok 4.7

$2.00

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

$0.07

Output Price per Million Tokens

Grok 4.7

$6.00

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

$0.30

💡 Cost Ratio: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 26.7x cheaper per input token than Grok 4.7.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.2%vs87.6%+8.4% MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.4%vs86.8%+9.4% MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.6%vs68.0%+13.4% MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.0%vs49.4%+9.4% MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.2%vs88.6%+6.4% MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs9.1%+0.6% MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Grok 4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash 🏆

Grok 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons