SHARE THIS:

Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX

Detailed technical comparison between Grok 4.7 (xAI) and GLM 5.3 FlashX (Zhipu AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Grok 4.7: 6 WinsvsGLM 5.3 FlashX: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GLM 5.3 FlashX

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 5.3 FlashX

$0.37 / MTok
xAIactive

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by xAI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Grok 4.7 represents a key architectural iteration in the xAI model family. First released in 2026-09-21, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 500,000 tokens (approximately 667 words), Grok 4.7 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Grok 4.7 Full Specs →
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 5.3 FlashX

GLM 5.3 FlashX is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Zhipu AI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, GLM 5.3 FlashX represents a key architectural iteration in the Zhipu AI model family. First released in 2026-09-18, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,048,576 tokens (approximately 1,398 words), GLM 5.3 FlashX processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View GLM 5.3 FlashX Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGrok 4.7GLM 5.3 FlashX
ProviderxAIZhipu AI
Context Window500,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Beta Access (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-09-212026-09-18

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Grok 4.7

$1.60

GLM 5.3 FlashX

$0.37

Output Price per Million Tokens

Grok 4.7

$4.80

GLM 5.3 FlashX

$1.25

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 4.3x cheaper per input token than Grok 4.7.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.2%vs75.6%+3.6% Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 🏆
GLM 5.3 FlashX
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.4%vs68.4%+9.0% Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 🏆
GLM 5.3 FlashX
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.6%vs41.6%+13.0% Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 🏆
GLM 5.3 FlashX
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.0%vs29.0%+11.0% Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 🏆
GLM 5.3 FlashX
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.2%vs76.2%+6.0% Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 🏆
GLM 5.3 FlashX
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs7.9%+0.6% Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 🏆
GLM 5.3 FlashX

Grok 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons