SHARE THIS:

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-6.1 Terra (OpenAI) and Nano Banana 2.1 (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-6.1 Terra: 3 WinsvsNano Banana 2.1: 3 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra

$1.00 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra is the mid-tier model in OpenAI's GPT-6.1 series, priced below GPT-6.1 Sol. It is suited for everyday agentic, coding, and writing work, is particularly strong at understanding screenshots...

View GPT-6.1 Terra Full Specs →
Googleactive

Nano Banana 2.1

Nano Banana 2.1 (Gemini Nano Banana 2.1) is Google's image generation and editing model on the Flash tier, succeeding Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro. It improves product recontextualization,...

View Nano Banana 2.1 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Context Window1,050,000 tokens🏆65,536 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-262026-10-06

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra

$1.00

Nano Banana 2.1

$1.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra

$5.00

Nano Banana 2.1

$7.50

💡 Cost Ratio: GPT-6.1 Terra is 1.5x cheaper per input token than Nano Banana 2.1.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.8%vs81.2%+1.4% Nano Banana 2.1
GPT-6.1 Terra
Nano Banana 2.1 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.0%vs79.4%+1.4% Nano Banana 2.1
GPT-6.1 Terra
Nano Banana 2.1 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.2%vs56.6%+1.4% Nano Banana 2.1
GPT-6.1 Terra
Nano Banana 2.1 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
40.6%vs38.6%+2.0% GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
Nano Banana 2.1
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.8%vs80.8%+2.0% GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
Nano Banana 2.1
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs8.3%+0.2% GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6.1 Terra 🏆
Nano Banana 2.1

GPT-6.1 Terra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nano Banana 2.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons