SHARE THIS:

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-6.1 Terra Pro (OpenAI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro: 2 WinsvsKimi K3.1 Pro: 4 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

$1.00 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-6.1 Terra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-6.1-terra), served with `reasoning.mode` set to `pro` for higher-quality responses on complex tasks. **Cost note:** pro mode spends far more...

View GPT-6.1 Terra Pro Full Specs →
Moonshot AIactive

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight multimodal reasoning model and a post-trained successor to Kimi K3, with a 1M-token context window. It is built for long-horizon coding, 3D...

View Kimi K3.1 Pro Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-6.1 Terra ProKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot AI
Context Window1,050,000 tokens🏆1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-262026-10-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

$1.00

Kimi K3.1 Pro

$2.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro

$5.00

Kimi K3.1 Pro

$10.00

💡 Cost Ratio: GPT-6.1 Terra Pro is 2.0x cheaper per input token than Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
88.4%vs85.6%+2.8% GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro 🏆
Kimi K3.1 Pro
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
87.6%vs84.8%+2.8% GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro 🏆
Kimi K3.1 Pro
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
65.4%vs66.0%+0.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
46.8%vs47.4%+0.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
86.0%vs86.6%+0.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.9%vs8.9%+0.1% Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro 🏆

GPT-6.1 Terra Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Kimi K3.1 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons