SHARE THIS:

GPT-5.3-Codex vs Mercury 2.5

Detailed technical comparison between GPT-5.3-Codex (OpenAI) and Mercury 2.5 (Inception AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GPT-5.3-Codex: 6 WinsvsMercury 2.5: 0 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-5.3-Codex

400,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Mercury 2.5

$0.04 / MTok
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by OpenAI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, GPT-5.3-Codex represents a key architectural iteration in the OpenAI model family. First released in 2026-02-24, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 400,000 tokens (approximately 533 words), GPT-5.3-Codex processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View GPT-5.3-Codex Full Specs →
Inception AIactive

Mercury 2.5

Mercury 2.5 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Inception AI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Mercury 2.5 represents a key architectural iteration in the Inception AI model family. First released in 2026-09-08, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 260,000 tokens (approximately 347 words), Mercury 2.5 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Mercury 2.5 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGPT-5.3-CodexMercury 2.5
ProviderOpenAIInception AI
Context Window400,000 tokens🏆260,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Stable GA (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-242026-09-08

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex

$1.75

Mercury 2.5

$0.04

Output Price per Million Tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex

$14.00

Mercury 2.5

$0.15

💡 Cost Ratio: Mercury 2.5 is 43.8x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.3-Codex.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
93.4%vs78.4%+15.0% GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex 🏆
Mercury 2.5
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
98.5%vs76.6%+21.9% GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex 🏆
Mercury 2.5
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
91.8%vs53.8%+38.0% GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex 🏆
Mercury 2.5
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
81.2%vs39.2%+42.0% GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex 🏆
Mercury 2.5
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
98.2%vs81.4%+16.8% GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex 🏆
Mercury 2.5
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.5%vs8.4%+1.1% GPT-5.3-Codex
GPT-5.3-Codex 🏆
Mercury 2.5

GPT-5.3-Codex Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Mercury 2.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons