← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GLM 4.7 Flash: 1 WinvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 5 Wins
Context Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

202,752 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs →
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGLM 4.7 FlashHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderZhipu AINous Research
Context Window202,752 tokens🏆131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-01-192024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 16.5x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
77.2%vs78.8%+1.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GLM 4.7 Flash
Hermes 3 405B Instruct 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.5%vs77.0%+1.5% GLM 4.7 Flash
GLM 4.7 Flash 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
40.0%vs54.2%+14.2% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GLM 4.7 Flash
Hermes 3 405B Instruct 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
31.0%vs39.6%+8.6% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GLM 4.7 Flash
Hermes 3 405B Instruct 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
80.0%vs81.8%+1.8% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GLM 4.7 Flash
Hermes 3 405B Instruct 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.1%vs8.4%+0.3% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GLM 4.7 Flash
Hermes 3 405B Instruct 🏆

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.