← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between GLM 4.7 Flash (Zhipu AI) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

GLM 4.7 Flash: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06 / MTok
Zhipu AIactive

GLM 4.7 Flash

As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...

View GLM 4.7 Flash Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGLM 4.7 FlashNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderZhipu AINvidia
Context Window202,752 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-01-192026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.06

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

$0.40

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$2.20

💡 Cost Ratio: GLM 4.7 Flash is 8.3x cheaper per input token than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
77.2%vs87.8%+10.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.5%vs87.0%+8.5% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
40.0%vs68.2%+28.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
31.0%vs49.6%+18.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
80.0%vs85.4%+5.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.1%vs9.1%+1.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra
GLM 4.7 Flash
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.