โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Gemma 4 26B A4B (Google) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemma 4 26B A4B: 0 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Gemma 4 26B A4B

262,144 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.07 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference โ€” delivering near-31B quality at...

View Gemma 4 26B A4B Full Specs โ†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemma 4 26B A4BHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderGoogleNous Research
Context Window262,144 tokens๐Ÿ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-04-032024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.07

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.34

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 14.3x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
78.4%vs78.8%+0.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
76.6%vs77.0%+0.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
53.8%vs54.2%+0.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.2%vs39.6%+0.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
81.4%vs81.8%+0.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.4%vs8.4%+0.0% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Hermes 3 405B Instruct ๐Ÿ†

Gemma 4 26B A4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons