Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GLM 5.2
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GLM 5.2.
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...
GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 4 26B A4B | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Zhipu AI | |
| Context Window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | beta |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-04-03 | 2026-06-16 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.06
GLM 5.2
$0.93
Output Price per Million Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.33
GLM 5.2
$3.00
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Gemma 4 26B A4B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
GLM 5.2 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.