← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 3n 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Gemma 3n 4B (Google) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemma 3n 4B: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.06 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemma 3n 4B

Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputs—including text, visual data, and audio—enabling diverse tasks...

View Gemma 3n 4B Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemma 3n 4BNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderGoogleNvidia
Context Window32,768 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-202026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.06

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.60

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.12

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$3.60

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemma 3n 4B is 10.0x cheaper per input token than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.0%vs87.8%+8.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3n 4B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.2%vs87.0%+9.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3n 4B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.4%vs68.2%+13.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3n 4B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.8%vs49.6%+9.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3n 4B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.0%vs85.4%+3.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3n 4B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs9.1%+0.7% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemma 3n 4B
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

Gemma 3n 4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3n 4B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3n 4B vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3n 4B vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3n 4B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3n 4B vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemma 3n 4B vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.