← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemma 3n 4B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Gemma 3n 4B (Google) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemma 3n 4B: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

131,072 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.06 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemma 3n 4B

Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputsβ€”including text, visual data, and audioβ€”enabling diverse tasks...

View Gemma 3n 4B Full Specs β†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemma 3n 4BHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderGoogleNous Research
Context Window32,768 tokens131,072 tokensπŸ†
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-05-202024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.06

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemma 3n 4B

$0.12

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Gemma 3n 4B is 16.7x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
79.0%vs78.8%+0.2% Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n 4B πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
77.2%vs77.0%+0.2% Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n 4B πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
54.4%vs54.2%+0.2% Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n 4B πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
39.8%vs39.6%+0.2% Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n 4B πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
82.0%vs81.8%+0.2% Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n 4B πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.5%vs8.4%+0.0% Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n 4B πŸ†
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Gemma 3n 4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons