SHARE THIS:

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.7

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 4 Argon (Google) and Grok 4.7 (xAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 4 Argon: 0 WinsvsGrok 4.7: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 4 Argon

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Tie

Equal Pricing
Googleactive

Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon is Google's flagship reasoning model, built for complex software engineering, deep mathematical and scientific problem solving, and autonomous multi-step agents. Google trained it to keep context across...

View Gemini 4 Argon Full Specs →
xAIactive

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering tasks, verifying its own work, and...

View Grok 4.7 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 4 ArgonGrok 4.7
ProviderGooglexAI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆500,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable releaseNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-132026-09-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 4 Argon

$2.00

Grok 4.7

$2.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 4 Argon

$10.00

Grok 4.7

$6.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Both models offer identical input token pricing ($2.00 / MTok).

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
72.8%vs79.2%+6.4% Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok 4.7 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.0%vs77.4%+8.4% Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok 4.7 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.2%vs54.6%+12.4% Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok 4.7 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
29.6%vs40.0%+10.4% Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok 4.7 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
76.8%vs82.2%+5.4% Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok 4.7 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
7.9%vs8.5%+0.5% Grok 4.7
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok 4.7 🏆

Gemini 4 Argon Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Grok 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Terra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 4 Argon vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 4 Argon vs Mercury 3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.