← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google) and GPT-4o (2024-05-13) (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 0 WinsvsGPT-4o (2024-05-13): 6 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

$0.30 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is a high-efficiency model from Google with upgraded agentic capabilities. It is suited for subagents that execute focused tasks within complex, multi-agent workflows.

View Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Full Specs →
OpenAIactive

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

GPT-4o ("o" for "omni") is OpenAI's latest AI model, supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. It maintains the intelligence level of [GPT-4 Turbo](/models/openai/gpt-4-turbo) while being twice as...

View GPT-4o (2024-05-13) Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-4o (2024-05-13)
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆128,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-07-212024-05-13

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

$0.30

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

$5.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

$2.50

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

$15.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 16.7x cheaper per input token than GPT-4o (2024-05-13).

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.2%vs79.4%+6.2% GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.4%vs77.6%+8.2% GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.6%vs54.8%+12.2% GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
30.0%vs40.2%+10.2% GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.2%vs82.4%+5.2% GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.5%+0.5% GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 🏆

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.