← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0 WinsvsKimi K3: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

$0.30 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a high-efficiency model from Google with upgraded agentic capabilities. It is suited for subagents that execute focused tasks within complex, multi-agent workflows.

View Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Full Specs →
Moonshot AIactive

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is a 2.8T parameter open-weight multimodal reasoning model from Moonshot AI. It is suited for complex coding, knowledge work, and long-horizon agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at...

View Kimi K3 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteKimi K3
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetabeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-07-212026-07-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

$0.30

Kimi K3

$3.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

$2.50

Kimi K3

$15.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 10.0x cheaper per input token than Kimi K3.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.2%vs78.6%+5.4% Kimi K3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.4%vs76.8%+7.4% Kimi K3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.6%vs54.0%+11.4% Kimi K3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
30.0%vs39.4%+9.4% Kimi K3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.2%vs81.6%+4.4% Kimi K3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.4%+0.4% Kimi K3
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Kimi K3 🏆

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Kimi K3 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.