← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚑ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.25 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...

View Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Full Specs β†’
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs β†’

Technical Specifications

πŸ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash LiteHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderGoogleNous Research
Context Window1,048,576 tokensπŸ†131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitybetastable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-072024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.25

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$1.50

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

πŸ’‘ Cost Ratio: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is 4.0x cheaper per input token than Hermes 3 405B Instruct.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
72.4%vs78.8%+6.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Hermes 3 405B Instruct πŸ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
68.6%vs77.0%+8.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Hermes 3 405B Instruct πŸ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
41.8%vs54.2%+12.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Hermes 3 405B Instruct πŸ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
29.2%vs39.6%+10.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Hermes 3 405B Instruct πŸ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
76.4%vs81.8%+5.4% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Hermes 3 405B Instruct πŸ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
7.9%vs8.4%+0.5% Hermes 3 405B Instruct
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Hermes 3 405B Instruct πŸ†

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons