← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.25 / MTok
Googleactive

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads. It supports text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs, and is designed for lightweight agentic...

View Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderGoogleNvidia
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆512,288 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitybetabeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-05-072026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$0.25

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

$1.50

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$2.20

💡 Cost Ratio: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is 2.0x cheaper per input token than Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
72.4%vs87.8%+15.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
68.6%vs87.0%+18.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
41.8%vs68.2%+26.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
29.2%vs49.6%+20.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
76.4%vs85.4%+9.0% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
7.9%vs9.1%+1.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.