โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

Detailed technical comparison between DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) and GPT-5.6 Terra Pro (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 0 WinsvsGPT-5.6 Terra Pro: 6 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

$0.09 / MTok
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by DeepSeek. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 represents a key architectural iteration in the DeepSeek model family. First released in 2026-07-31, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,048,576 tokens (approximately 1,398 words), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Full Specs โ†’
OpenAIactive

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by OpenAI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, GPT-5.6 Terra Pro represents a key architectural iteration in the OpenAI model family. First released in 2026-07-09, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,050,000 tokens (approximately 1,400 words), GPT-5.6 Terra Pro processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View GPT-5.6 Terra Pro Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens๐Ÿ†
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Beta Access (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-07-312026-07-09

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

$0.09

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

$0.18

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

$6.00

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 11.1x cheaper per input token than GPT-5.6 Terra Pro.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.0%vs90.8%+17.8% GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.2%vs92.0%+22.8% GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.4%vs79.2%+36.8% GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
29.8%vs57.6%+27.8% GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.0%vs89.8%+12.8% GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs9.2%+1.3% GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ๐Ÿ†

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons