โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

โšก Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 0 WinsvsGemini 3.6 Flash: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Tie

Equal Capacity
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

$0.09 / MTok
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by DeepSeek. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 represents a key architectural iteration in the DeepSeek model family. First released in 2026-07-31, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,048,576 tokens (approximately 1,398 words), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Full Specs โ†’
Googleactive

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Google. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Gemini 3.6 Flash represents a key architectural iteration in the Google model family. First released in 2026-07-21, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,048,576 tokens (approximately 1,398 words), Gemini 3.6 Flash processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Gemini 3.6 Flash Full Specs โ†’

Technical Specifications

๐Ÿ† = Superior Spec
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Context Window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Beta Access (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-07-312026-07-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

$0.09

Gemini 3.6 Flash

$1.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

$0.18

Gemini 3.6 Flash

$7.50

๐Ÿ’ก Cost Ratio: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 16.7x cheaper per input token than Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0โ€“100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
73.0%vs73.6%+0.6% Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Gemini 3.6 Flash ๐Ÿ†
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
69.2%vs69.8%+0.6% Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Gemini 3.6 Flash ๐Ÿ†
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
42.4%vs43.0%+0.6% Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Gemini 3.6 Flash ๐Ÿ†
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
29.8%vs30.4%+0.6% Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Gemini 3.6 Flash ๐Ÿ†
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
77.0%vs77.6%+0.6% Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Gemini 3.6 Flash ๐Ÿ†
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.0%vs8.0%+0.1% Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Gemini 3.6 Flash ๐Ÿ†

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons