SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.7

Detailed technical comparison between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (DeepSeek) and Grok 4.7 (xAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 0 WinsvsGrok 4.7: 6 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.15 / MTok
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the October 17, 2026 snapshot of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, served by DeepSeek under the `deepseek-flash` API model name. V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model...

View DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Full Specs →
xAIactive

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is SpaceXAI's flagship model for coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work, succeeding Grok 4.6. It is particularly strong at long-running software engineering tasks, verifying its own work, and...

View Grok 4.7 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆500,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-172026-09-21

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.15

Grok 4.7

$2.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.60

Grok 4.7

$6.00

💡 Cost Ratio: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 13.3x cheaper per input token than Grok 4.7.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
74.4%vs79.2%+4.8% Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Grok 4.7 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
70.6%vs77.4%+6.8% Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Grok 4.7 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
43.8%vs54.6%+10.8% Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Grok 4.7 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
31.2%vs40.0%+8.8% Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Grok 4.7 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
78.4%vs82.2%+3.8% Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Grok 4.7 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.1%vs8.5%+0.4% Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Grok 4.7 🏆

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Grok 4.7 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons