SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Detailed technical comparison between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (DeepSeek) and Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash (Google). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 6 WinsvsGemini Omni 1.2 Flash: 0 Wins
Context Leader

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.15 / MTok
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the October 17, 2026 snapshot of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, served by DeepSeek under the `deepseek-flash` API model name. V4.1 Flash is a sparse mixture-of-experts model...

View DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Full Specs →
Googleactive

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash is Google's native multimodal video generation and editing model, the successor to Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash. It generates clips up to 15 seconds long with native...

View Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Context Window1,048,576 tokens🏆131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelself hostablemanaged api
Production StabilityNot verifiedNot verified
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-10-172026-11-05

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.15

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$1.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

$0.60

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

$9.00

💡 Cost Ratio: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 10.0x cheaper per input token than Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
74.4%vs73.2%+1.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
70.6%vs69.4%+1.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
43.8%vs42.6%+1.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
31.2%vs30.0%+1.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
78.4%vs77.2%+1.2% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.1%vs8.0%+0.1% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 🏆
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons