SHARE THIS:

DeepSeek R1 vs Fugu Ultra v2

Detailed technical comparison between DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Fugu Ultra v2 (Sakana AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

DeepSeek R1: 6 WinsvsFugu Ultra v2: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Fugu Ultra v2

1,000,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

DeepSeek R1

$0.70 / MTok
DeepSeekactive

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by DeepSeek. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, DeepSeek R1 represents a key architectural iteration in the DeepSeek model family. First released in 2025-01-20, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 163,840 tokens (approximately 218 words), DeepSeek R1 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View DeepSeek R1 Full Specs →
Sakana AIactive

Fugu Ultra v2

Fugu Ultra v2 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Sakana AI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Fugu Ultra v2 represents a key architectural iteration in the Sakana AI model family. First released in 2026-09-11, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,000,000 tokens (approximately 1,333 words), Fugu Ultra v2 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Fugu Ultra v2 Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationDeepSeek R1Fugu Ultra v2
ProviderDeepSeekSakana AI
Context Window163,840 tokens1,000,000 tokens🏆
Agent Suitability78/100 (est.)Not yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)1800 ms (est.)No public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityStable GA (est.)Beta Access (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-01-202026-09-11

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek R1

$0.70

Fugu Ultra v2

$5.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

DeepSeek R1

$2.50

Fugu Ultra v2

$30.00

💡 Cost Ratio: DeepSeek R1 is 7.1x cheaper per input token than Fugu Ultra v2.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
90.8%vs87.2%+3.6% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 🏆
Fugu Ultra v2
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
92.8%vs86.4%+6.4% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 🏆
Fugu Ultra v2
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
93.1%vs67.6%+25.5% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 🏆
Fugu Ultra v2
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
62.1%vs49.0%+13.1% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 🏆
Fugu Ultra v2
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
90.5%vs88.2%+2.3% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 🏆
Fugu Ultra v2
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.3%vs9.1%+0.3% DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 🏆
Fugu Ultra v2

DeepSeek R1 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Reasoning model — not designed for high-frequency tool calling
  • Pair with a smaller model (V4 Flash) for routing and use R1 for complex reasoning only

Fugu Ultra v2 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons