← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Command A vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Detailed technical comparison between Command A (Cohere) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (Nous Research). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Command A: 6 WinsvsHermes 3 405B Instruct: 0 Wins
Context Leader

Command A

256,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00 / MTok
Cohereactive

Command A

Command A is an open-weights 111B parameter model with a 256k context window focused on delivering great performance across agentic, multilingual, and coding use cases. Compared to other leading proprietary...

View Command A Full Specs →
Nous Researchactive

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Hermes 3 is a generalist language model with many improvements over Hermes 2, including advanced agentic capabilities, much better roleplaying, reasoning, multi-turn conversation, long context coherence, and improvements across the...

View Hermes 3 405B Instruct Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationCommand AHermes 3 405B Instruct
ProviderCohereNous Research
Context Window256,000 tokens🏆131,072 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-03-132024-08-16

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Command A

$2.50

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Command A

$10.00

Hermes 3 405B Instruct

$1.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Hermes 3 405B Instruct is 2.5x cheaper per input token than Command A.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.6%vs78.8%+1.8% Command A
Command A 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.8%vs77.0%+1.8% Command A
Command A 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
56.0%vs54.2%+1.8% Command A
Command A 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.4%vs39.6%+1.8% Command A
Command A 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.6%vs81.8%+1.8% Command A
Command A 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs8.4%+0.2% Command A
Command A 🏆
Hermes 3 405B Instruct

Command A Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Hermes 3 405B Instruct Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs Kimi K3

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs GPT-4o-mini

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.