← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Command A vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Detailed technical comparison between Command A (Cohere) and Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Command A: 0 WinsvsNemotron 3 Ultra: 6 Wins
Context Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

512,288 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50 / MTok
Cohereactive

Command A

Command A is an open-weights 111B parameter model with a 256k context window focused on delivering great performance across agentic, multilingual, and coding use cases. Compared to other leading proprietary...

View Command A Full Specs →
Nvidiaactive

Nemotron 3 Ultra

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra is an open frontier-reasoning and orchestration model from NVIDIA, with 55B active parameters out of 550B total (MoE). Built on a hybrid Transformer-Mamba mixture-of-experts architecture, it...

View Nemotron 3 Ultra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationCommand ANemotron 3 Ultra
ProviderCohereNvidia
Context Window256,000 tokens512,288 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-03-132026-06-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Command A

$2.50

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$0.50

Output Price per Million Tokens

Command A

$10.00

Nemotron 3 Ultra

$2.20

💡 Cost Ratio: Nemotron 3 Ultra is 5.0x cheaper per input token than Command A.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Open Live Sandbox Playground →

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.6%vs87.8%+7.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Command A
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.8%vs87.0%+8.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Command A
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
56.0%vs68.2%+12.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Command A
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.4%vs49.6%+8.2% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Command A
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.6%vs85.4%+1.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Command A
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs9.1%+0.5% Nemotron 3 Ultra
Command A
Nemotron 3 Ultra 🏆

Command A Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nemotron 3 Ultra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs GLM 5.2

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs DeepSeek V3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.

SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW

Command A vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.