SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor (Meta). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Opus 5.5: 3 WinsvsMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor: 3 Wins
Context Leader

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

1,048,576 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

$0.10 / MTok
Anthropicactive

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Anthropic. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Claude Opus 5.5 represents a key architectural iteration in the Anthropic model family. First released in 2026-09-22, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,000,000 tokens (approximately 1,333 words), Claude Opus 5.5 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Claude Opus 5.5 Full Specs →
Metaactive

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Meta. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor represents a key architectural iteration in the Meta model family. First released in 2026-09-02, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,048,576 tokens (approximately 1,398 words), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Opus 5.5Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Beta Access (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-09-222026-09-02

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 5.5

$4.00

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 5.5

$20.00

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

$0.20

💡 Cost Ratio: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is 40.0x cheaper per input token than Claude Opus 5.5.

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
80.4%vs81.2%+0.8% Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Claude Opus 5.5
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor 🏆
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
78.6%vs79.4%+0.8% Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Claude Opus 5.5
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
55.8%vs56.6%+0.8% Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Claude Opus 5.5
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
41.2%vs38.6%+2.6% Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 🏆
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
83.4%vs80.8%+2.6% Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 🏆
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
8.6%vs8.3%+0.3% Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5 🏆
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Claude Opus 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons