Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Detailed technical comparison between Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Ling 3.1 Flash (Inclusion AI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.
Comparison Snapshot
Claude Haiku 5.5
1,000,000 tokensTie
Equal CapabilityTie
Equal SpeedLing 3.1 Flash
$0.00 / MTokClaude Haiku 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Anthropic. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Claude Haiku 5.5 represents a key architectural iteration in the Anthropic model family. First released in 2026-10-07, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,000,000 tokens (approximately 1,333 words), Claude Haiku 5.5 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Inclusion AI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Ling 3.1 Flash represents a key architectural iteration in the Inclusion AI model family. First released in 2026-10-02, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 262,144 tokens (approximately 350 words), Ling 3.1 Flash processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.
Technical Specifications
🏆 = Superior Spec| Specification | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Inclusion AI |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens🏆 | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | Not yet benchmarked | Not yet benchmarked |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | No public TTFT data | No public TTFT data |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | Beta Access (est.) | Stable GA (est.) |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-02 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5
$0.10
Ling 3.1 Flash
$0.00
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Haiku 5.5
$0.50
Ling 3.1 Flash
$0.00
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Standardized Scores (0–100%)Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.
Claude Haiku 5.5 Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Ling 3.1 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Explore Other Popular Comparisons
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Nano Banana 2.1
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Mistral Large 4
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Pro
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.
SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEWClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Prime
Compare context windows, live API token prices, and benchmark scores.