SHARE THIS:

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra

Detailed technical comparison between Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI). Review live API token pricing, context window capabilities, time-to-first-token latency, and verified benchmark scores side-by-side.

⚡ Executive Summary & Verdict

Comparison Snapshot

Claude Fable 5.1: 3 WinsvsGPT-6 Astra: 3 Wins
Context Leader

GPT-6 Astra

1,050,000 tokens
Agentic Tool-Calling

Tie

Equal Capability
Lowest Latency (TTFT)

Tie

Equal Speed
Input Price Leader

Tie

Equal Pricing
Anthropicactive

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by Anthropic. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, Claude Fable 5.1 represents a key architectural iteration in the Anthropic model family. First released in 2026-09-01, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,000,000 tokens (approximately 1,333 words), Claude Fable 5.1 processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View Claude Fable 5.1 Full Specs →
OpenAIactive

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra is an advanced artificial intelligence model engineered by OpenAI. Tailored for complex multi-step reasoning, programming synthesis, and extended document comprehension, GPT-6 Astra represents a key architectural iteration in the OpenAI model family. First released in 2026-09-04, it serves enterprise developers, research teams, and autonomous system architects requiring strict instruction compliance. Featuring an input capacity of 1,050,000 tokens (approximately 1,400 words), GPT-6 Astra processes multi-file code repositories, lengthy technical reports, and complex prompts in a single inference call.

View GPT-6 Astra Full Specs →

Technical Specifications

🏆 = Superior Spec
SpecificationClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens🏆
Agent SuitabilityNot yet benchmarkedNot yet benchmarked
Time to First Token (TTFT)No public TTFT dataNo public TTFT data
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production StabilityBeta Access (est.)Beta Access (est.)
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-09-012026-09-04

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Fable 5.1

$10.00

GPT-6 Astra

$10.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Fable 5.1

$50.00

GPT-6 Astra

$50.00

💡 Cost Ratio: Both models offer identical input token pricing ($10.00 / MTok).

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt benchmarks in our dynamic multi-model Sandbox. Compare execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Standardized Scores (0–100%)

Scores show verified raw accuracy percentages across standardized AI evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior performance in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
95.8%vs95.4%+0.4% Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 🏆
GPT-6 Astra
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
96.5%vs96.8%+0.3% GPT-6 Astra
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra 🏆
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
93.9%vs94.2%+0.3% GPT-6 Astra
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra 🏆
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
87.2%vs86.0%+1.2% Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 🏆
GPT-6 Astra
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
98.7%vs98.8%+0.1% GPT-6 Astra
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra 🏆
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
9.7%vs9.7%+0.0% Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 🏆
GPT-6 Astra

Claude Fable 5.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

GPT-6 Astra Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Explore Other Popular Comparisons