arrow_backBack to research feed
llmPublished: July 8, 2026

Co-LMLM: Continuous-Query Limited Memory Language Models

By Yair Feldman, Linxi Zhao, Nathan Godey, Dongyoung Go, Yilun Hua, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Jennifer J. Sun, Yoav Artzi

Research TL;DR

"Proposes continuous-query LMLM (CO-LMLM) that replaces relational knowledge base queries with flexible vector queries, enabling human-readable retrieval without sacrifice; outperforms prior LMLMs and vanilla LLMs in perplexity and factual accuracy."

Abstract

Limited memory language models (LMLMs) externalize factual knowledge during pretraining to a knowledge base (KB), rather than memorizing it in their weights. During generation, the model then fetches knowledge from the KB as needed. This recently introduced paradigm provides multiple advantages, including knowledge control capabilities that remain beyond conventional LLMs. We propose continuous-query LMLM (CO-LMLM), where the KB pairs continuous keys with textual knowledge values, a significant departure from prior reliance on relational KB and queries. CO-LMLM generates flexible vector queries at minimal cost, while still integrating human-readable and attributable retrieved knowledge into its generation. We pair this design with an annotation pipeline that tags free-form factual spans in arbitrary text, removing prior work's restriction to Wikipedia. Across pretraining on Wikipedia and FineWeb-Edu and at multiple model scales, CO-LMLM outperforms prior LMLMs and vanilla LLMs in both perplexity and factual precision. At 360M scale, this includes lower perplexity than models pretrained on 40x more data, and SimpleQA-verified performance that is in line with gpt-4o-mini and higher than Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Technical Analysis & Implementation

Overview§

CO-LMLM extends Limited Memory Language Models (LMLMs) by introducing a knowledge base (KB) with continuous keys and textual values. This eliminates the need for a relational schema, allowing flexible vector queries derived from the model's hidden states. The retrieved text is integrated into generation via cross-attention, improving factual accuracy while maintaining readability.

Methodology§

Continuous-Query Knowledge Base§

During pretraining, the model learns to project its hidden state $\mathbf{h}_t$ into a query vector $\mathbf{q}_t = \mathbf{W}_q \mathbf{h}_t$. The KB consists of $N$ key-value pairs: keys $\mathbf{k}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and values $v_i$ (text spans). Retrieval computes similarity:

$$ s_i = \frac{\mathbf{q}_t^\top \mathbf{k}_i}{\|\mathbf{q}_t\| \|\mathbf{k}_i\|} $$

The top-$k$ values are retrieved and their embeddings are concatenated or cross-attended with the language model.

Training with Span Annotation§

An annotation pipeline tags factual spans in arbitrary text (e.g., Wikipedia, FineWeb-Edu). Each span is paired with a continuous key learned jointly with the model. The training objective combines next-token prediction $\mathcal{L}_{LM}$ and a contrastive retrieval loss $\mathcal{L}_{ret}$:

$$ \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{LM} + \lambda \mathcal{L}_{ret}, \quad \mathcal{L}_{ret} = -\log \frac{\exp(s_+) }{\sum_{i} \exp(s_i)} $$

where $s_+$ is the similarity with the correct key.

Inference with Retrieval§

At each step, the model produces a query from the current hidden state, retrieves top-$k$ text values, and attends to them as additional context. This provides explicit, attributable knowledge without storing facts in weights.

Implementation Details§

The KB is stored as a matrix $\mathbf{K} \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times d}$ and value embeddings are precomputed from a frozen text encoder. During forward pass, retrieval is performed via efficient approximate nearest neighbor search (e.g., FAISS).

Code Snippet (PyTorch)§

import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F

class COLMLM(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, llm, kb_keys, kb_vals, d_model, top_k=5):
        super().__init__()
        self.llm = llm
        self.query_proj = nn.Linear(d_model, d_model)
        self.kb_keys = nn.Parameter(kb_keys)  # (N, d)
        self.kb_val_emb = nn.Embedding.from_pretrained(kb_vals, freeze=True)  # (N, d_val)
        self.top_k = top_k

    def forward(self, input_ids):
        hidden = self.llm(input_ids)  # (B, L, d)
        query = self.query_proj(hidden[:, -1, :])  # (B, d)
        # Compute cosine similarity
        q_norm = F.normalize(query, dim=-1)
        k_norm = F.normalize(self.kb_keys, dim=-1)
        scores = torch.mm(q_norm, k_norm.t())  # (B, N)
        topk = torch.topk(scores, self.top_k, dim=-1).indices  # (B, k)
        # Retrieve value embeddings
        val_emb = self.kb_val_emb(topk)  # (B, k, d_val)
        # Cross-attend: simplified as mean pooling and addition
        context = val_emb.mean(dim=1)  # (B, d_val)
        hidden_aug = hidden[:, -1, :] + context  # fuse
        return hidden_aug  # used for next token prediction

Results§

CO-LMLM achieves lower perplexity than prior LMLMs and vanilla LLMs at multiple scales. At 360M parameters, it outperforms models trained on 40x more data and achieves SimpleQA factual accuracy comparable to gpt-4o-mini and exceeding Claude Sonnet 4.5. This demonstrates the effectiveness of continuous-query retrieval for knowledge-intensive generation.

Interactive SEO Tool

Embedding Vector Similarity Visualizer

Embeddings represent text in high-dimensional vector spaces. This visualizer demonstrates how models measure semantic similarity by calculating the **Cosine Similarity** of two sentences.

Cosine Similarity:0.4020
Vocabulary Size14 unique terms
Shared Terms3 terms
Intersecting Vocabulary
thebrownover
Vector Projection PlaneXYθ = 66°Vector AVector Bθ = 90° is orthogonal (0% match) · θ = 0° is parallel (100% match)

Mathematical Formulation

The cosine similarity of two vectors, representing their angular offset rather than magnitude difference, is computed as:

\[\text{Cosine Similarity} = \cos(\theta) = \frac{\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{B}}{\|\mathbf{A}\| \|\mathbf{B}\|} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} A_i B_i}{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{n} A_i^2} \sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{n} B_i^2}}\]

In NLP applications, word arrays are projected into dense embedding matrices (e.g. 1536 dimensions). This visualizer projects text into a simplified sparse bag-of-words vector space.

SHARE RESEARCH:
INTEGRATED RECOMMENDATION

Accelerate your workflow with Araho

Need help choosing the right model for your product? We build AI-native MVPs.

Get your MVP built in weeks with top-tier AI developers.