Seed-2.0-Mini vs Step 3.7 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Seed-2.0-Mini and Step 3.7 Flash.
Seed-2.0-Mini
Seed-2.0-mini targets latency-sensitive, high-concurrency, and cost-sensitive scenarios, emphasizing fast response and flexible inference deployment. It delivers performance comparable to ByteDance-Seed-1.6, supports 256k context, four reasoning effort modes (minimal/low/medium/high), multimodal understanding,...
Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is StepFun's latest high-efficiency multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model. It pairs a 196B-parameter language backbone with a vision encoder for native image and video understanding, activating roughly 11B parameters...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Seed-2.0-Mini | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | StepFun |
| Context Window | 262,144 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-02-26 | 2026-05-28 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Seed-2.0-Mini
$0.10
Step 3.7 Flash
$0.20
Output Price per Million Tokens
Seed-2.0-Mini
$0.40
Step 3.7 Flash
$1.15
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Seed-2.0-Mini Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Step 3.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.