โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Seed-2.0-Mini vs Step 3.5 Flash

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Seed-2.0-Mini and Step 3.5 Flash.

ByteDance

Seed-2.0-Mini

Seed-2.0-mini targets latency-sensitive, high-concurrency, and cost-sensitive scenarios, emphasizing fast response and flexible inference deployment. It delivers performance comparable to ByteDance-Seed-1.6, supports 256k context, four reasoning effort modes (minimal/low/medium/high), multimodal understanding,...

View Full Specs
StepFun

Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is StepFun's most capable open-source foundation model. Built on a sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, it selectively activates only 11B of its 196B parameters per token....

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationSeed-2.0-MiniStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderByteDanceStepFun
Context Window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-262026-01-29

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Seed-2.0-Mini

$0.10

Step 3.5 Flash

$0.10

Output Price per Million Tokens

Seed-2.0-Mini

$0.40

Step 3.5 Flash

$0.30

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Seed-2.0-Mini Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Step 3.5 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.